Court Rules on Meal Periods and Rest Breaks

by connecttohr on June 4, 2012

The California Supreme Court recently reached a long-awaited decision clarifying an employer’s obligation with regard to meal periods and rest breaks.  The case, Brinker Restaurant Group v. Superior Court, filed in 2004, brought into question whether an employer merely needs to make available a meal period for employees, or whether they need to ensure that no work is done by the employee during that period.

According to Kara L. Arguello, member of Berliner Cohen’s Employment Law Group, “The Court ruled that the employer’s obligation is to relieve its employee of all duties, with the employee thereafter at liberty to use the meal period for whatever purpose he or she desires. The employer need not ensure that no work is done.”  Additionally, “The Court held that the first meal period must be provided no later than the end of the fifth hour worked, and the second meal period no later than the end of the tenth hour worked, but that there are no other timing requirements placed on meal periods.”

With regard to rest breaks, the Court said that employers must make a good faith effort to permit rest breaks in the middle of each work period, but may deviate from that if practical considerations call for breaks to be taken at other times.  As a general rule, during an 8-hour workday, there should be one 10-minute rest break in the work period prior to the meal break, and one 10-minute rest break in the work period following the meal break.  See legal opinion from Kara L. Arguello for more information.

You may want to check your Employee Handbook to ensure that any content regarding meal periods and rest breaks reflects the Court’s decision.

THIS BLOG POST IS OF A GENERAL NATURE AND IS NOT INTENDED TO ADDRESS ALL ISSUES OR PROBLEMS THAT MIGHT ARISE IN ANY EMPLOYMENT RELATED MATTER. NOR IS IT INTENDED TO BE LEGAL ADVICE, WHICH CAN ONLY BE RENDERED BY A DULY LICENSED ATTORNEY-AT-LAW. READERS SHOULD CONSULT WITH A LAWYER IF THEY HAVE SPECIFIC CONCERNS THAT THEY FEEL ARE LEGAL IN NATURE. NEITHER CONNECT TO HR OR MICHELLE MENDOZA HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR HOW THIS INFORMATION IS APPLIED IN PRACTICE OR FOR THE ACCURACY OF THIS INFORMATION. THIS BLOG POST IS PROVIDED AS AN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCE ONLY, AND CONNECT TO HR OR MICHELLE MENDOZA SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION LOST REVENUES OR LOST PROFITS THAT MAY RESULT FROM THE USE OF THIS INFORMATION.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

© 2013 · All rights reserved · Customized by Diva Designz

Connect To HR >> 5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 229 >> Santa Clara, CA 95054 >> phone: 408.768.1075 >> email: connecttohr@yahoo.com >> Disclaimer